Skip Navigation



Advanced Search



Prostate Cancer Treatment with Da Vinci


Prev 1 2 Next

Prostatectomy (dVP)


 

Causes of Prostate Cancer

While the causes of prostate cancer are largely unknown, it is clear that the chance of developing prostate cancer increases in men over 50. Close relatives of men who have had prostate cancer are also more likely to be affected. Ethnic origin appears to play a part: Men of African heritage are at highest risk, and men of Far-Eastern descent have the lowest risk of developing prostate cancer. It may be possible to reduce the risk by following a low-fat diet and staying in shape. For example, men may reduce their risk through daily exercise and by cutting back on foods high in animal fat.

Diagnosis

Testing a blood sample for the level of Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) plays an important part in the early detection of prostate cancer. PSA is a substance made by the normal prostate gland. Although PSA is mostly found in semen, a small amount is also present in the blood.

Most men have levels under four nanograms per milliliter (ng/mL) of blood. When prostate cancer develops, the PSA level usually goes above 4; however, a high PSA score does not always indicate cancer.

Although a digital rectal exam (DRE) is less effective than the PSA blood test in finding prostate cancer, this exam can sometimes find cancers in men with normal PSA levels. For this reason, the American Cancer Society guidelines recommend the use of both the DRE and PSA blood test for early prostate cancer detection.

When a physician suspects prostate cancer based on a patient's symptoms, the results of a DRE and/or a PSA, the diagnosis must be made by doing a biopsy. The physician will use transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) for guidance to insert a narrow needle through the wall of the rectum and into several areas of the prostate gland. The needle then removes the cylindrical tissue sample, which is sent to the laboratory to test for cancer.

If the biopsy shows the presence of prostate cancer, the pathologist assigns each tissue sample a grade, indicating how far the cells have traveled along the path from normal to abnormal. A tumor with a low grade is likely to be slow growing, while one with a high grade is more likely to grow aggressively or to already have spread outside the prostate (metastasized).

The most widely used grading method for prostate cancer is known as the Gleason grading system.

Treatment Options

According to statistics collected in the early 1990s, approximately 30 percent of prostate cancer patients in the United States were treated with surgery, 30 percent were treated with radiation and 20 percent elected watchful waiting. Most of the remaining 20 percent were treated with a combination of therapies. In Europe, by contrast, watchful waiting was the standard treatment for asymptomatic prostate cancer.

Radical Prostatectomy

Radical prostatectomy, or surgical removal of the prostate and surrounding cancerous tissues, is considered the “gold standard” or best way to eradicate prostate cancer. Radical prostatectomy is a complex and delicate procedure due to many factors, including the location of the prostate gland deep inside the pelvis. In radical prostatectomy, the surgeon removes the entire prostate gland along with both seminal vesicles, both ampullae (the enlarged lower sections of the vas deferens), as well as additional surrounding tissues. The section of urethra that runs through the prostate is cut away; with it may also come some of the sphincter muscle that controls the flow of urine.

The popularity of surgery in the United States has grown tremendously in recent decades. A study of Medicare patients' records found that by 1990, the number of U.S. men receiving radical prostatectomy was six times greater than the number recorded for 1984. The increase was seen in all age groups, from the youngest (age 65) to men in their 80s.

The emergence of radical prostatectomy as a preferred prostate cancer treatment has corresponded with wider availability of minimally invasive surgery. Studies show that for many patients, a minimally invasive approach can reduce complications and promote faster recovery times. In the United States today, surgeons use one of three approaches to radical prostatectomy: open surgery, laparoscopic surgery and robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery, of which the latter two are minimally invasive.

Three Approaches to Radical Prostatectomy: Open, Laparoscopic and Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic ( da Vinci ® Prostatectomy)

An open prostatectomy requires an 8-10 inch incision on the patient's abdomen for direct access to the operative site. Conventional laparoscopic and robotic-assisted laparoscopic approaches require several dime-sized incisions, or operating “ports,” which are used to introduce narrow-shafted instruments. The surgeon and assistants maneuver the instruments from outside the body, under vision provided by a surgical camera.

The potential advantages of laparoscopic and robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy over conventional open surgery include smaller incisions for less post-operative pain and improved cosmetics; reduced blood loss and less need for blood transfusions, as well as a faster return to normal activities.

The two major drawbacks of conventional laparoscopy are that it relies on the use of rigid, hand-held instruments and visualization provided by a standard 2D video monitor. While these technologies enable smaller incisions, they can limit the surgeon's sense of depth of field, his/her dexterity and precision. Standing at the patient's side, the surgeon must operate in a counterintuitive fashion, moving the long-shafted instrument handle in precisely the opposite direction as he or she intends to move the instrument tip. The surgeon maneuvers the instruments while looking up at the 2D view of the operating field projected on a tableside video monitor and while instructing an assistant on how to position the surgical camera.

In contrast, da Vinci Prostatectomy ( dVP ) incorporates state-of-the-art robotic technologies that provide natural depth of field and allow a surgeon's hand movements to be scaled, filtered and translated into precise micro-movements of tiny instruments at the operative site. The superior visualization, enhanced dexterity, precision and control enable the surgeon to perform complex procedures — like radical prostatectomy — through dime-sized operating “ports.”

For most patients, da Vinci Prostatectomy offers substantially less pain and a much shorter recovery than traditional prostate surgery. Other advantages may include reduced need for blood transfusions, less scarring and less risk of infection. In addition, recent studies suggest that dVP may offer improved cancer control and a lower incidence of impotence and urinary incontinence.

Due to its obvious advantages, dVP has become the fastest growing treatment for prostate cancer in the United States. Moreover, dVP has already been used to successfully treat thousands of prostate cancer patients worldwide. This year, it is expected that 20% of all prostatectomies will be performed using this technique, and that this percentage will continue to grow rapidly.

Cryosurgery

Cryosurgery uses liquid nitrogen or argon gas to freeze and kill prostate cancer cells. Guided by a Trans Rectal Ultra Sound (TRUS), the doctor places needles in pre-selected locations in the prostate gland, and then dilates the needle tracks to insert thin, metal cryoprobes through the skin of the perineum into the prostate. Liquid nitrogen in the probes forms an ice ball that freezes the prostate cancer cells. As the cells thaw, they rupture.


Bottom of Navigation